More Post-Debate Navel Gazing

Two of the best short pieces I’ve read have been by Josh Marshall:

First, the pattern in the 2000 and 2004 presidential debates was essentially this: the Democrat generally won each debate on points and even in the snap polls of undecided voters. But there was usually some remark or bit of affect that — ludicrous or not — right-wing commentators and yakkers fixed in on and were able to parlay into the dominating conversation of the next few days. In this way, strong debate performances turned into weak debate performances.

I’m not seeing anything like that this time. Mainly that’s because Obama just didn’t make any mistakes. But I suspect it’s also because there’s now more meta-media parity between right and left

and James Fallows:

For years and years, Democrats have wondered how their candidates could “win” the debates on logical points — that is, tactics — but lose the larger struggle because these seemed too aggressive, supercilious, cold-blooded, or whatever. To put it in tactical/strategic terms, Democrats have gotten used to winning battles and losing wars. Last night, the Democratic candidate showed a far keener grasp of this distinction than did the Republican who accused him of not understanding it.

And then from Jonathan Weisman, there’s this great piece of political theater that explains a lot if it actually went down this way.

 

Advertisements

One Response to More Post-Debate Navel Gazing

  1. Eugene says:

    Obama’s team is nearly flawless – well prepared, wickedly smart, strategic and execute. I keep hearing Barack is top among them. Doesn’t surprise me that they’d done their homework.

    And, it doesn’t surprise me that House Republicans won’t get on board. I’m hearing they tried trading support for a lower capital gains tax. Well . . . it’s easier to be the spoiler as the minority when you don’t have the responsibility to get things done. Ds know that position well.

    Thankfully Ds in power when Bush/Paulson brought the bailout plan to Congress, otherwise it would have passed in the middle of the night without any oversight or equity kickers – I’m not such a fan of CEO caps (not because I disapprove of the concept but because I’m not sure how the hell this works – call me mail boy and give me options). As to mortgage relief, I’m good with bankruptcy judge leniency or some other administrative leeway but not supportive of breaks for anyone who lied or otherwise committed fraud.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: